Muse Wonder 1.0: price, plans and where it ranks
Official sources only.
Strengths and limits
- Meant for
- Meta's larger Muse model (the company's own words)
- Best at
- all-round tests (#7 on LiveBench 2.0 Overall); reasoning (#10 on LiveBench 2.0 Reasoning)
- Relatively weaker at
- coding (#12 on LiveBench 2.0 Coding)
- Context (how much it can read at once)
- 1M tokens
- Inputs and outputs
- Not published on the page we checked
- Effort / thinking levels
- Not published on the page we checked
- In which plans
- The company's plan pages don't name this model.
- Watch out for
- Standard mode only on the API (your content isn't used for training).
"Best at" and "weaker at" come from this model's best and worst placings on the independent leaderboards we carry (all rankings); we don't run our own tests. Other facts2. When to use which model.
API price
| Input / 1M | Output / 1M | Cached input / 1M | Notes | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US$4.00 | US$20.00 | US$0.20 | Standard mode only (Contributor mode not offered for Muse Wonder), so your content is not used to train Meta models. Web search grounding $2.50 per 1,000 queries | 2 |
Where Muse Wonder 1.0 ranks
| Leaderboard | Rank | Score | Setting |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiveBench 2.0 Reasoning1 | #10 | 90.6 | – |
| LiveBench 2.0 Coding1 | #12 | 86.2 | – |
| LiveBench 2.0 Overall1 | #7 | 74.2 | – |
| LiveBench 2.0 cost per successful task1 | – | 2.015 | – |
Different tests, different scales: never compare scores across rows. All rankings explained.
Sources checked Oct 26 to Nov 2, 2026.